Ind AS 102 Share-Based Payments establishes the accounting and disclosure requirements for transactions in which an entity receives goods or services in exchange for its own equity instruments or incurs liabilities based on the value of its shares. The standard promotes transparency and consistency in financial reporting by ensuring that the cost of share-based compensation is appropriately recognized.
However, not every transaction involving shares or equity instruments falls within the scope of Ind AS 102. Understanding these scope exclusions is essential for businesses, finance professionals, auditors, and investors to ensure accurate accounting treatment and regulatory compliance.
In this guide, we explain the major scope exclusions under Ind AS 102 and provide practical insights for businesses in 2026.
Ind AS 102 applies to transactions where:
The standard covers:
Scope exclusions prevent overlap between accounting standards and ensure that transactions are accounted for under the most appropriate Ind AS framework.
Incorrectly applying Ind AS 102 can lead to:
Therefore, identifying whether a transaction falls within or outside the scope of Ind AS 102 is critical.
One of the most significant exclusions relates to business combinations.
When an entity acquires another business and issues shares as part of the acquisition consideration, the transaction is accounted for under Ind AS 103 Business Combinations, not Ind AS 102.
Example:
Company A acquires Company B and issues shares worth ₹50 crore as consideration.
Since the shares are issued to acquire a business rather than goods or services, Ind AS 103 applies.
Transactions involving financial instruments that fall under:
are excluded from Ind AS 102.
Example:
Issuing convertible debentures, warrants, or derivative contracts generally falls under financial instrument standards rather than share-based payment accounting.
When shareholders contribute assets or cash in their capacity as owners rather than as suppliers of goods or services, such transactions are outside the scope of Ind AS 102.
Example:
A promoter injects additional capital into the company without receiving compensation for services.
This is treated as an equity contribution rather than a share-based payment.
Traditional rights issues and bonus issues offered to existing shareholders are generally not considered share-based payment transactions.
These transactions represent capital restructuring activities rather than compensation for goods or services.
Example:
A company issues bonus shares in a 1:1 ratio to existing shareholders.
This transaction does not fall under Ind AS 102.
Intra-group transfers and restructuring arrangements may fall outside the scope of Ind AS 102 if they do not involve compensation for goods or services.
The applicable accounting treatment depends on the nature and objective of the transaction.
| Transaction | Covered by Ind AS 102? |
|---|---|
| Employee Stock Option Plan (ESOP) | Yes |
| Share-based bonus to employees | Yes |
| Shares issued to consultants | Yes |
| Acquisition of a company through shares | No |
| Bonus issue to shareholders | No |
| Rights issue | No |
| Promoter capital contribution | No |
| Convertible financial instruments | No |
Many companies incorrectly apply Ind AS 102 to acquisition-related share issuances that should be accounted for under Ind AS 103.
The economic substance of the transaction should determine accounting treatment.
Different standards require different valuation approaches. Applying the wrong standard can result in inaccurate financial statements.
Proper documentation is necessary to support the accounting treatment adopted by the company.
Determine whether shares are issued:
Assess whether:
Keep detailed agreements, valuation reports, board resolutions, and supporting documents.
Complex share-based arrangements often require expert accounting and valuation guidance.
Ind AS 102 plays a crucial role in accounting for share-based payment transactions. However, several important transactions fall outside its scope, including business combinations, financial instruments, shareholder capital contributions, bonus issues, and rights issues.
Understanding these exclusions helps businesses avoid accounting errors, maintain regulatory compliance, and present accurate financial statements. Before applying Ind AS 102, companies should carefully evaluate the nature of the transaction and determine whether another accounting standard is more appropriate.
As regulatory scrutiny and financial reporting standards continue to evolve in 2026, a clear understanding of Ind AS 102 scope exclusions remains essential for finance professionals and business owners alike.
1. What are scope exclusions under Ind AS 102?
Scope exclusions are transactions that are specifically accounted for under other accounting standards and therefore do not fall within Ind AS 102.
2. Are business combinations covered by Ind AS 102?
No. Business combinations are accounted for under Ind AS 103.
3. Does Ind AS 102 apply to bonus shares?
No. Bonus share issues are generally outside the scope of Ind AS 102.
4. Are financial instruments covered under Ind AS 102?
No. Financial instruments are generally covered under Ind AS 32 and Ind AS 109.
5. Does Ind AS 102 apply to ESOPs?
Yes. Employee Stock Option Plans are one of the most common applications of Ind AS 102.